Non-invasive Spinal Options Set New Standard in Treatment and
Rehabilitation
'As complications arise resulting from surgical treatment of spinal
disorders, health care professionals look for a non-surgical,
patient-friendly solution.'
By Dan Pastorius
January 2005
The debate about the necessity of invasive surgery to treat spinal
disorders has reached a critical moment, as noninvasive treatment options
have been rapidly gaining recognition among physicians. Whereas many
therapists cite open spinal surgery as causing greater complications and
some morbidity for patients, alternative treatments — such as orthoses,
hands-on techniques and new technologies — have proven more effective,
less precarious options in rehabilitation and elimination of spine-related
pain. Before therapy can occur, the first step in actively treating patients
with spinal disorders is to accurately assess the precise root of the
problem. According to Malcom R. Hooper, director of the Melbourne Hyperbaric
and the Spinal Rehabilitation Group, Australia’s largest
non-hospital-based Hyperbaric Medicine service provider, the key to a
successful outcome for any patient is to establish the exact cause and
nature of the condition at the outset of treatment.

“Numerous patients have received many forms of physical treatments and
medications for years, without proper and often with inadequate clinical
investigation,” he said. “Inappropriate diagnosis and treatment is often
more detrimental than just leaving the patient alone. What starts out as a
single level problem may eventually emerge as a disease and/or degenerative
process because of inappropriate treatment recommendations, which may in
fact further compromise a poor and inadequate immune response.
“Every patient is different and every patient’s condition is
different,” Hooper continued. “Gone are the days of simply operating,
giving another drug or cracking your back and hoping for a good outcome.”

Short-Term Solution
The spine is defined as being the central pathway of the body — not
only does it operate as the mechanical connection between the arms and legs,
but it serves as an internal nerve highway running from the brain to the
rest of the body. For that reason, surgery to the spine can only be viewed
as a precarious procedure, full of potential complications and long-term
risks. What is naively perceived as a non-life-threatening condition can
quickly become a life-altering disaster, which is why it is important for
both surgeons and patients to investigate and look into all available
treatment options.
Dr
Mal Hooper attending the recent 3rd Joint Congress of the Swiss, Austrian
and German Society of Neurorehabilitation and World Federation for
Neurological Rehabilitation; Zurich 2004
A doctor who has spent the better part of his career researching these
treatments is Bogdan M. Luklinski, MSc, of the Luklinski Clinic in London.
He believes that surgical procedures such as fusion and discectomy involve a
crude and costly approach to treating back pain, and considers spinal
surgery completely unnecessary for the vast majority of back conditions no
matter how severe they are initially claimed to be.
“When I started my studies of the spine more than 30 years ago, I came
to the conclusion that spinal surgery was definitely the wrong approach to
the treatment of chronic and acute pain, because no matter how serious a
spinal condition, it can always be cured or at least made asymptomatic,”
noted Luklinski. “The spine is a biomechanical wonder, but it cannot
function properly if disks are cut away or vertebrae are fused together, and
many patients are persuaded to undergo more than one spinal operation when
preceding operations fail.”
Sharing a similar outlook as Luklinski, Hooper is also quick to criticize
spinal surgery, noting that many times surgeons perform spinal operations as
a temporary solution rather than a long-term cure.
“Patients are too frequently offered surgical strategies and procedures
which are designed to provide a ‘quick fix’ — an attempt to alleviate
pain — however the quick fix in most instances contributes to the
long-term suffering and the continued deterioration of the patients’
condition,” said Hooper. “Who has benefited? Certainly not the patient.
You have to get to the root of the problem clinically and not just provide
short-term strategies with the outward symptoms”

Oxygen Therapy
To facilitate noninvasive treatment measures that equate to nominal
results, Hooper adopted a revolutionary treatment dubbed Hyperbaric Oxygen
Therapy (HBOT) into his practice. HBOT safely delivers 100% oxygen to a
patient through a mask or hood while inside a pressurized air chamber. The
pressure inside the chamber causes the oxygen breathed to be dissolved at
greater levels in the blood. This provides an approximate 2,000% increase in
tissue oxygenation, which significantly accelerates the rate of healing,
stabilization and repair of the spine.
|
|

|
|
|
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy provides an approximate
2,000% increase in tissue oxygenation, which significantly
accelerates the rate of healing, stabilization and repair of the
spine.
|
Hooper noted that his original objective in incorporating HBOT into his
practice was to raise awareness of the treatment, promote early usage and
intervention in major hospitals, and continued rehabilitation in day
facilities for the long-term injured. His results, he admitted, speak for
themselves, as he has found that both the frequency and intensity of his
spinal patients’ episodes have greatly diminished and the need for ongoing
treatment has been significantly reduced.
“The impact of HBOT, coupled with assertive physical therapy, has
clearly demonstrated that complex illness including spinal and related
neurovascular disorders can be significantly influenced with greater success
outcomes,” Hooper said. “Conditions previously thought to be beyond the
limitations of conventional treatments have been afforded dramatic, and in
many patients, astonishing results by the mechanisms of HBOT coupled with
assertive physical therapy. Our work demonstrates that even small gains can
dynamically affect the quality of life for these patients.”
Although he admitted that HBOT is not offered as a guaranteed cure,
Hooper noted that the treatment continues to demonstrate dramatic immune
responses, assisting patients with problems ranging from simple delayed
wound healing to complex disabilities and impairment. In a controlled
environment, including defined entry and exit policy with pre- and
post-diagnostic assessment, he said that HBOT is a safe and effective
treatment option with minimal side effects to the patient.
“My initial thoughts were that perhaps the mechanisms associated with
the clinical effects of HBOT might have a role in the clinical management of
patients with acute and chronic pain due to disk prolapse, failed back
surgery and spinal cord dysfunction,” he said. “Little did we realize
that, in fact, the inclusion of HBOT would completely revolutionize the way
in which spinal and related disorders could be clinically assessed and
treated.”

Hands-On Alternatives
Despite the fact that HBOT provides a competent treatment of spinal
disorder, a more common method might appeal to therapists looking for a more
hands-on alternative. Suggesting that the traditional tried and tested
method generally works best, Luklinski said that mobilization — a
procedure involving a small oscillatory movement of varying amplitudes
combined with a manual rotation and traction movement — is a painless and
essential procedure in spinal treatment.
Although most chiropractors and osteopaths rely on manipulation over
mobilization, Luklinski noted that mobilization is generally the most
effective and all around safest procedure for treating chronic spinal
conditions such as correcting slippage or a herniated disk.
“Mobilization is by far the most effective procedure for treating
serious spinal disorders,” he noted. “This achieves the aim of freeing a
trapped nerve or restoring a slipped disk by gently restoring the passive
mobility of the affected spinal joints through carefully applied pressure
and/or oscillatory movement. It cannot cause the patient any harm and always
produces good results, whereas the clunk-click approach of manipulation can
often be contraindicated by many conditions and generally should not be
performed.”
Nonetheless, when combating spinal disorders that leave patients with
partial paralysis, Marmaduke D.R. Loke, a product and solution developer for
Dynamic Bracing Solutions, has codeveloped a lower extremity orthotic system
that builds upon the fundamental principles of prosthetics. Citing triplanar
control as the underlying key for alignment and realignment of the body, the
orthosis incorporates a series of levers involving all three planes for the
patient to walk over and balance on. As variations in the levers affect
balances and stresses within each plane, walking efficiency is enhanced and
body compensations are reduced or eliminated to maintain balance and a more
normal gait appearance.
“What we are trying to do is reestablish what normal walking parameters
are, and bring the weight back to the extremities that are weakened and
supported by the brace,” Loke said. “My focus is to get them standing
and walking more efficiently with a better lower limb orthosis. Through this
new technology, we are now able to do and emulate what we’ve all been
doing in prosthetics for quite some time, which is to get people to walk
with a normal gait appearance and even run by just using bracing systems.”

Continuous Rehabilitation
Once a patient completes treatment and begins the rehabilitation process,
the patient must remain motivated and continue forward with postsurgical
exercises to speed healing. To reach their maximum potential, patients need
to realize that healing requires commitment, work and determination, with
the payoff resulting in a fit physique and a much higher quality of life.
In an effort to keep rehabilitation as diverse and energetic as possible,
Loke recommends programs that blend flexibility, balance and mental focus
into a patient’s rehab regimen. One program he suggested is Pilates, a
series of exercise movements designed to improve strength, flexibility, and
range of motion, and also to encourage musculoskeletal alignment. Regardless
of a person’s level of body fitness, Pilates body conditioning programs
can be integrated into rehabilitative exercise and diverse physical therapy
programs designed to speed recovery of spinal injuries.
|
To reach their maximum potential, patients
need to realize that healing requires commitment, work and
determination, with the payoff resulting in a fit physique
and a much higher quality of life.
|
|
|
“Maintaining range of motion allows better mobility, balance and
efficiency that is integral for patients with spinal injury to obtain the
most potential from new developments in bracing,” Loke said. “Aside from
Pilates, we have also found that tai chi works wonders — a recent study
showed that one group of geriatrics did tai chi and the other did nothing,
and the group that did tai chi was able to reduce their falls by 48%. So
basically, any type of conditioning with stretching and maintaining normal
range of motion are important issues when it comes to the rehabilitation of
patients, not just for people suffering from spinal disorders, but
everybody.”
As an alternate to exercise programs, clinical devices can also be used
to combat chronic spinal pain and aid in a patient’s rehabilitation.
Luklinski recommends his own invention, the Back-Rack, as a quintessential
aid in successfully treating most forms of back pain. Constructed from
high-quality wood and consisting of a number of lateral spindles, the device
is designed to treat stiffness, muscular pain, sciatica and back pain, among
other symptoms.
“The wooden nodules push up on either side of the spine, and this lifts
the individual vertebrae, causing them to pivot about the joints in the
back,” Luklinski said. “As a result of this, the joints are decompressed
and the spine lengthens, joint mobility and soft tissue elasticity
increases, and stiffness and back pain are therefore reduced. In addition to
this, the pressure on the joints and the intervertebral disks is lowered,
thus lowering the risk of spinal osteoarthritis and bulging, or herniated
disks.”
On the other hand, for patients suffering from paralysis or partial
spinal cord injuries, Hopper recommends a different yet equally unique
technology. Dubbed the Lokomat by creators, the device consists of a powered
exoskeleton robot that retrains patients to walk by distributing power to
their hip and knee joints. The device operates by strapping the patient’s
legs to the machine, while a suspended harness supports their upper body
weight over a treadmill. Once the patient is perched, the walking begins to
take place, with an emphasis on the fact that the repetitive movement may
eventually help them redevelop and regain functional walking patterns.
“Much of the brain’s control of walking is linked to neural circuits
located within the spinal cord,” Hooper said. “Research strongly
suggests that this spinal circuitry, even when limited as with partial
spinal cord injuries, can be functional and retrained to generate walking
movements. Therapy to generate those movements advances into dramatically
new territory with Lokomat, due largely to the machinery’s precision.”

Dedication Important
As time passes, some patients may ultimately feel less pain and be well
on their way to a healthy recovery. From a psychological standpoint, this
could be attributed to the fact that better tools and better solutions give
patients the determination and potential to do more to fight against their
disability. An important lesson for patients to learn early is that despite
how they feel after treatment, it is important for therapy to continue and
for them to give their all, despite the pain or odds stacked against them.
“Following treatment, mobility and strengthening exercises are given to
a patient to prevent a recurrence of the problem,” Luklinski noted.
“Positive patients always recover quicker than those with bad outlooks.
Recovery is not psychological, although chronic spinal pain can make
patients insecure and dependent because they are in constant pain. It could
ultimately create a psychosomatic circle.”
Luklinski makes it clear that recovery should represent to the patient a
demanding yet rewarding process. Loke maintains a more casual outlook while
echoing the same sentiments. Once the orthotist or therapist does his or her
job in helping the patient get back up to speed, it is the patient’s
responsibility to continue forward and not let all of their combined hard
work and progress go to waste. Even great athletes must practice to stay on
top of their game.
“I’ve seen people really flip in terms of motivation, once new hope
is provided,” said Loke. “We must keep them aware of the fact that we
can only enable someone with better solutions, and that it is their job to
be committed to see the rewards — it is up to the patient to continue
working on it. But it does take time to retrain, and patients have to
realize that it is a life-long commitment that in most cases will reap
rewards, and for some of them, rewards once thought unobtainable.”
|